Blog

  • Instead of complaining that people don’t have the proper takeaways form chaos science, why not create my own little series on fractal and chaotic phenomena. Often, the descriptions that are available online are very mathematical, and it is not immediately obvious why the information should be relevant to you. That is particularly true, if you have no clue about the subject yet. I’ll try to go with a minimum of mathematics in the beginning, and try to explain it step by step.

    Posted , Author

  • Jemand erklärt mir, Quantenmechanik ist der Beweis dafür: alles ist Bewusstsein, und ich spontanentlade im Google+-Feed von Jutta Ahrens.

    Ich glaube, manche verwechseln rekursive Interaktion mit Nichtexistenz, weil sie sie gedanklich irgendwie wieder in die lineare Kausalität aufklappen.

    Den Rant muss ich hier aber für alle Ewigkeit festhalten, dass ich zu sowas fähig bin, ich! :-) …

    Posted , Author

  • Mis-attempts at physics questions:

    Audience: “Is there a connection between the dark force and black holes?”
    Susskind: “Dark matter or dark energy?”




    Posted , Author

  • If something is probabilistic, chances are that the underlying reality is looped and complex.

    Posted , Author

  • Krauss is the first guy I hear saying what I’ve preaching for years: The question where the universe came from or what caused it makes no sense.

    If time and space arise with the universe, there is no causality or locus outside of it. You’re simply asking a question that points outside of the universe’s domain. Those questions can be asked, but they are pure nonsense.

    Posted , Author

← Older Newer →